Actor James Woods blasts California Governor Gavin Newsom over Los Angeles ICE riots, demanding his resignation amid escalating violence and blaming Democratic policies for the state’s deteriorating conditions.
At a Glance
- James Woods called for Governor Gavin Newsom’s resignation, blaming him for the destruction of California by “invaders”
- Woods rejected Newsom’s claim that President Trump manufactured the crisis, instead pointing to Democratic policies
- The activist group behind the riots reportedly received $34 million in taxpayer funding from California Democrats
- LAPD Chief reported protesters using dangerous weapons against officers during the violent demonstrations
- President Trump has directed federal agencies to assist in restoring order in Los Angeles
Woods Demands Newsom’s Resignation
Conservative actor James Woods publicly called for California Governor Gavin Newsom to resign over the escalating ICE riots in Los Angeles. Taking to social media, Woods accused Newsom of being a “fraud” and blamed Democratic leadership for the state’s deteriorating conditions. The actor’s comments came as violent demonstrations erupted across Los Angeles following standoffs between leftist protesters and ICE agents conducting enforcement operations in the area.
Woods directly responded to Newsom’s attempts to shift blame to the Trump administration. When Newsom suggested that President Trump was “manufacturing a crisis” in California, Woods fired back, pointing to the visible destruction across Los Angeles as evidence of the governor’s failed leadership. The actor’s criticism highlighted the growing tension between state and federal authorities over immigration enforcement actions.
Taxpayer Funding Behind the Riots
A significant revelation emerged regarding the financing of groups involved in the riots. California State Assembly member Carl DeMaio claimed that CHIRLA, a group allegedly instigating the violent protests, received approximately $34 million in taxpayer money from California Democrats. Woods amplified this claim, suggesting that taxpayers were essentially funding the very organizations causing destruction in their communities.
The financial connection between Democratic leadership and activist groups has raised questions about accountability and the appropriate use of public funds. Woods and other critics have suggested cutting financial support to these organizations as a necessary step toward restoring order. This controversy adds another dimension to the ongoing debate about immigration policy and enforcement in California.
Escalating Violence and Federal Response
LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell reported that protesters were using increasingly dangerous weapons against law enforcement officers. According to police reports, demonstrators launched projectiles at officers, creating hazardous conditions for both law enforcement and bystanders. The escalating violence prompted Woods to share images and videos of the riots, highlighting the chaos unfolding on Los Angeles streets.
In response to the deteriorating situation, President Trump directed the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense to assist in managing the civil unrest. Woods shared a post from FBI Director Kash Patel emphasizing the federal government’s commitment to restoring law and order in Los Angeles. The involvement of federal agencies signals the seriousness of the situation and the national security implications of the ongoing riots.
Political Implications
Woods connected the riots to broader criticisms of Democratic governance, warning voters about the consequences of supporting Democratic candidates. “When you vote Democrat, you’re voting for this,” Woods stated, suggesting that the chaos in Los Angeles exemplifies the results of progressive policies on immigration and law enforcement. His comments reflect growing frustration among conservatives about the handling of immigration issues in Democratic-led states.
As federal authorities work to restore order in Los Angeles, the political fallout continues to spread. The riots have become a flashpoint in the national debate on immigration policy, with both sides using the events to reinforce their positions. For Woods and his supporters, the unrest represents a failure of Democratic leadership, while Newsom and his allies continue to point to federal immigration enforcement as the root cause of the disturbances.
