
Israel’s recent attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities divides U.S. lawmakers along partisan lines, with Republicans praising the strikes while some Democrats warn of potential regional destabilization.
At a Glance
- Israel’s Operation Rising Lion targeted Iranian nuclear facilities and killed several high-ranking military officials
- Republican leaders strongly supported Israel’s actions as defensive and necessary
- Democrats are divided, with some backing Israel while others claim Netanyahu is sabotaging peace negotiations
- Iran condemned the strikes as a “declaration of war,” raising concerns about regional escalation
- President Trump’s administration had been negotiating with Iran prior to the Israeli attacks
Republican Support for Israel’s Preemptive Strikes
Republican leadership has expressed unwavering support for Israel’s military operation against Iran’s nuclear program. Senate Majority Leader John Thune emphasized that Iran’s long-standing threats toward Israel justified the preemptive action. House Speaker Mike Johnson likewise backed Israel’s right to defend itself, pointing to the shared U.S.-Israeli goal of preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. The strikes targeted both nuclear facilities and key Iranian military figures, including General Hossein Salami.
“For too long, the mullahs in Iran have publicly aspired to wipe the only democracy in the Middle East off the face of the map via any means possible: funding and arming terror groups on Israel’s borders, choking off international sea lanes, and multiple barrages of missiles and drones. Iran must never gain access to a nuclear weapon. Today, Israel has determined that it must take decisive action to defend the Israeli people.”, said John Thune
Several high-profile Republican senators issued strong statements backing Israel’s actions. Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) declared he was “Proud to stand with Israel,” while Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) dramatically stated “Game on. Pray for Israel.” These responses reflect the Republican party’s consistent pro-Israel stance and hawkish position on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio clarified that American forces were not involved in the attack.
Democratic Division Over Israel’s Actions
The Democratic party has shown significant division in its response to Israel’s operation. Some pro-Israel Democrats, notably Senator John Fetterman (D-PA), voiced strong support for the strikes. “Our commitment to Israel must be absolute and I fully support this attack. Keep wiping out Iranian leadership and the nuclear personnel,” Fetterman stated. This faction aligns closely with Republican supporters in viewing Iran’s nuclear program as an existential threat to Israel that requires decisive action.
“Our commitment to Israel must be absolute and I fully support this attack. Keep wiping out Iranian leadership and the nuclear personnel.”, stated Sen. John Fetterman.
However, a significant faction of Democrats has criticized the Israeli operation as dangerous and potentially destabilizing. Senator Chris Murphy accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of deliberately sabotaging the Trump administration’s negotiations with Iran. “This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu’s own making,” Murphy stated, suggesting the attack served Netanyahu’s domestic political interests rather than regional security. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called for de-escalation while criticizing President Trump’s handling of the situation.
A MUST READ!! Victor Davis Hanson: Can Trump Troll His Way to a Peace Deal in Ukraine?
Handicapping the dispute between two conservatives I admire: Vice President J.D. Vance and Niall Ferguson.
Two conservatives whom I like and greatly admire—Niall Ferguson and J.D.… pic.twitter.com/EUsCZs7mLn
— Giacomo Jacques BEHAR (@BeharGiacomo) February 21, 2025
Concerns About Regional Escalation
Iran’s leadership has responded to Israel’s strikes with strong condemnation, calling them a “declaration of war.” This response has heightened fears among some U.S. lawmakers about potential regional escalation. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) characterized the strikes as reckless and called for restraint, while Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Representative Greg Casar (D-TX) advocated for negotiation rather than military action. Even some isolationist Republicans, including Representative Warren Davidson (R-OH), expressed concern about enthusiasm for potential war.
“Israel’s attack on Iran, clearly intended to scuttle the Trump administration’s negotiations with Iran, risks a regional war that will likely be catastrophic for America and is further evidence of how little respect world powers – including our own allies – have for President Trump. This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu’s own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict that he said may be good for Netanyahu’s domestic politics, but it will likely be disastrous for both the security of Israel, the United States and the rest of the region.”, said Chris Murphy.
The International Atomic Energy Agency had recently reported Iran’s increased uranium enrichment, leading to a censure vote by France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. President Trump’s administration had reportedly been negotiating with Iran, with the president mentioning a 60-day ultimatum that Iran failed to meet. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu remains resolute in his commitment to continue operations against what Israel perceives as existential threats, despite international concern about broader regional conflict.