DeMaio PUSHES AB 567 – Homeowners RELIEF Soon?

California’s homeowners face a self-inflicted insurance crisis that could be solved by reforming outdated regulations hampering the market’s ability to price risk accurately.

At a Glance

  • California homeowners are experiencing massive insurance rate increases and policy cancellations due to outdated regulatory frameworks
  • Proposition 103, passed in 1988, severely restricts insurers’ ability to raise rates based on actual risk assessments
  • State Assemblyman Carl DeMaio has introduced the CA Insurance Reform and Rate Stabilization Initiative (AB 567) to address the crisis
  • Experts point to poor wildfire management and restrictive regulations as primary causes rather than climate change
  • Proposed solutions include regulatory reform, improved forest management, and allowing market-based pricing

The Root of California’s Insurance Crisis

California homeowners are facing an unprecedented insurance crisis marked by skyrocketing premiums and widespread policy cancellations. Despite having some of the highest property values in the nation and increasing wildfire risks, Californians have historically paid less than the national average for homeowners insurance. This artificially suppressed market is now collapsing under the weight of regulatory constraints that prevent insurance companies from charging rates that reflect actual risk, causing major insurers to limit coverage or abandon the state entirely.

At the heart of this problem is Proposition 103, a voter-approved measure from 1988 that severely restricts insurers’ ability to raise rates. Under this framework, insurance companies must undergo a lengthy, expensive approval process with the state insurance commissioner before implementing any rate increases. This regulatory bottleneck has created a dysfunctional market unable to respond to changing risk landscapes, particularly as wildfires have grown more frequent and destructive throughout the state.

Legislative Action to Address the Crisis

State Assemblyman Carl DeMaio has introduced the California Insurance Reform and Rate Stabilization Initiative (AB 567) to tackle the growing crisis. The proposed legislation includes a “Cap and Cut” plan that would limit insurance rate increases to 7% annually for four years, with the state covering costs above this cap. This approach aims to provide immediate relief to homeowners while addressing the underlying regulatory problems that have distorted the market.

DeMaio’s initiative targets multiple factors contributing to the crisis, including reducing costly insurance regulations, reforming construction regulations to lower rebuilding costs, and implementing more effective fire management policies. The plan proposes allocating $1 billion annually for fuel reduction and suspending regulations that hinder brush clearing efforts. Additionally, it calls for temporarily suspending the state insurance tax and redirecting funds from climate change programs to stabilize rates.

Beyond Climate Change: Regulatory Failures and Solutions

While some politicians attribute California’s insurance woes to climate change, experts point to the state’s regulatory climate as the primary culprit. DeMaio and other analysts emphasize that inflation, poor wildfire management practices, and restrictive insurance regulations have created a perfect storm in the market. The inability of insurers to use modern catastrophe modeling tools for wildfire risk assessment until recently has further hampered accurate pricing and risk management.

The Independent Institute suggests comprehensive reforms, including allowing market-based pricing and risk assessment. Recent regulatory changes have lifted prohibitions on using catastrophe models for wildfire risk assessment, but experts argue more substantial reforms are needed. A functioning insurance market would naturally incentivize home hardening measures and discourage building in high-risk areas, creating a more sustainable housing landscape across the state.

Land Management and Broader Housing Reform

Better land management practices, including forest thinning and prescribed burns, are essential components of any comprehensive solution to California’s insurance crisis. Decades of fire suppression have allowed dangerous fuel loads to accumulate in forests, increasing wildfire severity. AB 567 addresses this by proposing substantial funding for fuel reduction efforts and removing regulatory barriers to proper forest management.

California’s restrictive zoning and permitting regulations have pushed development into wildland-urban interface areas, increasing exposure to fire risks. Broader reforms in housing policy could help redirect development to lower-risk areas and reduce overall wildfire exposure. Allowing insurance markets to function properly would provide price signals that accurately reflect risks, guiding development decisions and encouraging mitigation efforts where appropriate.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR