The far-left Washington Post has snubbed Vice President Kamala Harris, refusing to endorse her for president.
If the nation’s most radical left-winger can’t get the endorsement of the Washington Post, you know something funny is going on…
At a Glance
- Washington Post breaks 36-year tradition, decides not to endorse a presidential candidate
- Jeff Bezos, the paper’s owner, reportedly influenced the decision
- Decision “shocked” the left-leaning newsroom, causing negative reactions
- Editorial page editor cites creating “independent space” for readers as reason
- Speculation arises about Bezos’s government contracts influencing the decision
Washington Post’s Unprecedented Non-Endorsement
The Washington Post, a stalwart of left-wing American journalism, has made waves by deciding not to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris for president. This marks the first time in 36 years that the paper has refrained from endorsing a presidential candidate, a move that has sent shockwaves through political circles and the media landscape.
Yikes.
This should have been an easy win for Kamala.
The decision, reportedly influenced by Jeff Bezos, the paper’s owner, comes at a critical juncture when early voting trends appear to favor former President Donald Trump. This unexpected stance has not only “shocked” the paper’s predominantly left-leaning newsroom but has also sparked intense debate about the role of media giants in shaping political narratives.
An endorsement of Kamala Harris was drafted by Post staffers but had yet to be published, according to sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The decision not to publish was made by The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos, according to the same sources. https://t.co/WC9fovTcvB
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) October 25, 2024
The Bezos Factor: Business Interests and Media Influence
Bezos’s significant contracts with the U.S. government have come under scrutiny in light of this decision. Critics argue that these business interests may have played a role in the Post’s non-endorsement, raising questions about the intersection of corporate power and journalistic integrity.
OCTOBER SURPRISE: Washington Post Snubs Kamala Harris with Non-Endorsement https://t.co/FuQbsrSc2x
— CombsJC (@RedState66) October 25, 2024
The announcement of the non-endorsement came during a tense meeting with the editorial staff, causing negative reactions and raising concerns about the paper’s editorial independence.
Yep. The paper’s woke journalists aren’t happy.
David Shipley, the editorial page editor, attempted to justify the decision by stating it was meant to create “independent space” for readers to decide whom to vote for. However, this explanation has done little to quell the unrest within the newsroom.
The Power Players Behind the Decision
Speculation is rife about who made the final call on this controversial decision. While Bezos’s influence is widely suspected to be the cause, there are questions about the role of Will Lewis, the Publisher and CEO chosen by Bezos. Lewis’s background in dealing with conservative power centers adds another layer of complexity to the situation. The lack of transparency regarding the decision-making process has only fueled further debate and criticism.
Washington Post Snubs Kamala Harris with Non-Endorsement https://t.co/RI9n8iwoY7
— ToddMac14 (@mac14_todd) October 25, 2024
The Washington Post’s non-endorsement of Kamala Harris could have significant implications for her political future and the 2024 presidential race. As a major media outlet, the Post’s decision may influence public perception and potentially sway undecided voters. This move also raises questions about Harris’s standing within the Democratic Party and her ability to garner support from key institutional players.
The future doesn’t look bright for Kamala.
