The New Yorker’s endorsement of Kamala Harris reveals a staggering critique of Joe Biden’s presidency, turning heads and stoking debates on the future of American leadership.
At a Glance
- Kamala Harris is endorsed for President, seen as capable of ending the Trump era.
- The 2024 election is viewed as a national crisis, with Trump posing a threat to democracy and stability.
- Biden’s poor debate performance led to his withdrawal and the endorsement of Harris.
- The New Yorker was one of the first left-leaning publications to urge Biden to step aside after his debate performance.
The New Yorker Endorses Kamala Harris, Criticizes Joe Biden’s Progressive Record
The New Yorker has made a bold move by endorsing Kamala Harris for President while delivering a scathing critique of Joe Biden.
And something like this doesn’t happen often with the left-wing press.
The magazine positions Harris as a champion for progressive change, portraying her as the proactive leader necessary for moving forward. In stark contrast, Biden is criticized for allegedly obstructing progress throughout his political career.
The endorsement places heavy emphasis on the failures of Biden’s administration, particularly highlighting his decline in performance over the past eighteen months. The editors at The New Yorker did not hold back, accusing Biden, his advisers, and Democratic Party leadership of blocking younger candidates to maintain their grip on power. They argue that his diminishing capabilities have left the country vulnerable at a critical time.
Incredibly, though, the outlet doesn’t seem to recognize that Kamala Harris is as incapable and dangerous as Joe Biden…
A National Crisis and the Trump Threat
The 2024 election is portrayed as a national crisis by The New Yorker, with Donald Trump posing an existential threat to democracy and stability. Harris is seen as the antidote to Trump’s divisive politics, promising to end what many view as a nightmarish era. Trump’s presidency is blamed for amplifying negative political currents such as nativism, racism, and misogyny.
The magazine details Trump’s actions, repeating lies about his alleged claims about fallen soldiers to threatening NATO and emboldening autocrats. The usual stuff.
The New Yorker’s endorsement of Harris also underscores Biden’s physical and mental decline, which has been increasingly difficult to ignore. With his debate performances reportedly exposing his vulnerabilities, the magazine was among the first to call for his withdrawal in favor of Harris.
Endorsing Harris isn’t just about her being more capable than Biden. It is a criticism of how the Democratic leadership has managed the transition of power. The editors argue that Biden stood in Harris’s way, revealing a vulnerability in his leadership style. The New Yorker’s pointed endorsement is a significant pivot, spotlighting the failures within the current administration and advocating for a necessary shift in leadership to achieve their progressive goals.
Joe Biden is going to be pretty hurt about this, don’t you think? He was once seen as the guy to beat Trump, but now he’s been cast out by his own party.
