The FDA is poised to ban a controversial food dye linked to cancer and behavioral issues in children, potentially reshaping the American food industry.
At a Glance
- FDA considering ban on red dye No. 3 due to health concerns
- Dye linked to cancer in animal studies and behavioral problems in children
- Already banned in cosmetics since 1990 and in several other countries
- Decision expected soon, following recent Senate hearing
- Ban would impact nearly 3,000 food products currently using the dye
FDA Weighs Ban on Controversial Red Dye
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is on the verge of a decision that could dramatically alter the appearance of countless food products on American shelves. The agency is considering a ban on red dye No. 3, a petroleum-based color additive commonly used in candies, drinks, and other products. This potential ban comes amid mounting concerns over the dye’s links to cancer and behavioral problems in children.
The FDA’s consideration of this ban is not without precedent. In fact, red dye No. 3 has been banned in U.S. cosmetics since 1990 due to carcinogenicity evidence in laboratory rats. However, it has remained in use in food products, despite being largely banned in the European Union and other countries. The stark contrast between its treatment in cosmetics and food has raised eyebrows and fueled calls for action.
The FDA may finally move to ban Red No. 3, which is made from petroleum and gives food and drinks a bright cherry color.
A decision is expected in the coming weeks. https://t.co/8e980VftSV
— NBC News (@NBCNews) December 9, 2024
Health Concerns and Political Pressure
The push for a ban on red dye No. 3 has gained momentum, with consumer advocacy groups and politicians calling for its removal from food products. Frank Pallone, Jr., D-N.J., has been particularly vocal, urging the FDA to take action. His argument centers on the dye’s potential to mislead consumers by artificially altering food appearance.
“There is simply no reason for this chemical to be in our food except to entice and mislead consumers by changing the color of their food so it looks more appealing. With the holiday season in full swing where sweet treats are abundant, it is frightening that this chemical remains hidden in these foods that we and our children are eating,” Pallone wrote in a letter to the agency.
Today I’m urging @US_FDA to ban Red Dye 3 in our food.
This dangerous chemical is simply used to entice and mislead consumers by changing the color of their food so it looks more appealing.
It’s long past time to ban it. https://t.co/bIfSRUWKa9
— Rep. Frank Pallone (@FrankPallone) December 5, 2024
Industry Response and Regulatory Challenges
The potential ban has not gone unchallenged. The National Confectioners Association opposes state-level bans, arguing they undermine FDA authority and create confusion. This resistance highlights the complex interplay between industry interests, public health concerns, and regulatory oversight.
Adding to the complexity, the FDA faces significant resource constraints in its efforts to review food chemical safety. During a recent Senate hearing, FDA officials expressed frustration over limited resources for these critical reviews. This limitation raises questions about the agency’s ability to effectively monitor and regulate the vast array of substances in our food supply.
“[Food dyes] are a priority, but I want to point out that we have a very small staff and we have repeatedly asked for better funding for chemical safety. Please look at our request for funding for the people who do this work,” Dr. Califf of the FDA stated during the hearing.
